The last congressional hearing in Mexico was packed full of new analysis and information about our little alien mummy friends, so I went through it again and collected some highlights from the analysis of over a dozen different doctors and scientists:
Sidenote: I generated my own transcript of the entire 4-hour hearing and did some manual editing to clarify some points and add sections. You can view that transcript here.
I want to highlight the advancements in the studies of humanoid-characteristic beings found in Peru, as well as the presentation of two new species with their respective studies that we will have today. That is to say, there is not just one species; to this day, there are three, and I want to tell you something else; these are not the only ones, there are more. The discovery is much bigger than we thought.
- On August 1, 2019, the National University "San Luis Gonzaga" (UNSLG) of Ica, Peru, received four desiccated bodies with both human and reptilian characteristics.
- The largest body, which we call "María", has a shape similar to that of a human being, but with notable anatomical differences, among which an elongated skull and the presence of three fingers on both hands and fingers stand out. feet. The osteological and imaging analysis of the extremities shows structural harmony and congruence, without evidence of mutilation of the phalanges, and rather (evidence of inflammatory sequelae in the dorsal column and feet), except in the case of the smallest body, which we have called " wawita".
- The smaller bodies, which are approximately 60 cm in length, exhibit a morphological and anatomical structure that differs significantly from that of humans. The skin has morphological and histological characteristics that resemble those of reptiles, and both the hands and feet are tridactyls. In addition, they have voluminous skulls and their bone and joint system in general differs significantly from human anatomy, showing atypical, unique and "suí generis" features and characteristics. It is important to note that no rigid or metallic elements of union and support have been found in the joints of the entire body. Due to the uniqueness of these bodies and the marked anatomical and structural differences, more exhaustive research is required to better understand their nature.
- Metallurgical analysis, carried out by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), of a metallic pectoral implant revealed an important finding. It was determined that the implant is composed of an alloy of several metals, with osmium being the predominant element. It is relevant to note that osmium is an element that was officially discovered by Smithson Tennant and William Hyde Wollaston in 1803. Due to its electrical properties, osmium is used in the manufacture of some electronic devices and in the production of sensors. Additionally, the microscopic study through optical metallography has revealed the existence of a matrix of microstructures with microporosities and microinclusions in the implant.
- Finally, as a result of our investigations, the research team has come to the conclusion that the desiccated bodies studied are completely authentic from a biological point of view, and show no signs of having been manipulated or manufactured in any way. Our scientific approach has been rigorous, and the results contribute to the authenticity of these bodies.
In October of 2016, we were contacted by a Peruvian journalist, Mr. Terrios Tambini, and a certain Paul Ronceros, who had recovered strange biological mummified objects. He told us that one of his friends, the infamous Mario, had found near a funeral site north of Nazca a strange subterranean archaeological complex composed of galleries and tunnels and rooms on various levels, and in very poor condition.
In January 2017, I sent a letter to Dr. Nieto, the Minister of Culture, and later to the President of the Republic, Pedro Pablo Kuczynski, to draw attention to the possible discovery and the risk of looting of archaeological sites in the Nazca and Palpa areas by treasure hunters, but they did nothing. In February and March 2017, in collaboration with my friend Albon and with the support of many internet users, we financed and began researching various biological elements that Mario had provided. At that time, they were severed heads and large three-fingered hands. Later, in March, Mario revealed complete bodies of humanoid-reptilian types. The first was named Albert by internet users, and the second, which we can see on the screen, was named Josefina.
Jaime: Thierre, thank you very much, Thierre. It means that there is much more?
Yes, the site, for me, is the hottest point. And if the site exists, and we know it does, there must be hundreds or thousands of these bodies.
Similarly, fingerprints have been found on the hands and feet of Maria, and these prints are not of Homo sapiens. We have spiral prints, while Maria has parallel prints.
I verified that it is not a biological entity previously described on Earth and, as has already been explained, there is no evidence that it is the product of the evolution of any species that has existed at any time or that currently exists, and it does not correspond to any phylogenetic evolutionary process on this planet. I dedicated dozens of hours to ensure there is total correspondence with the tomographic images, and I determined that they are not a product of human manufacturing.
This structure is similar to a furcula, except for one, which the team named 'Josefina' who has been surgically operated, that is, there has been a surgical extraction and a spontaneous vital repair of the bone continuity.
The neck is mobile but only in one axis, meaning they can only have movement from side to side, but not from up to down. I am referring to the articulation between the first vertebra and the skull. The neck is also retractable, as is the entire spine, and what we call the abdomen. In the neck area, there is no spinal canal, but there are nerve cords that emerge from the skull in the posterior area and then join to form what we call the spinal cord within a spinal canal starting from the thorax. The absence of a jaw is verified, but there is a respiratory opening and another for feeding. There is an opening for the respiratory and alimentary canal in the anterior part of the skull, which comes out from the anterior floor of the base of the skull towards the front area of the neck. The neck is connected to the middle floor of the skull, not like us Sapiens who have it in the posterior floor of the base of the skull.
These beings were always bipedal, meaning evolutionarily they have not had a stage of using their front limbs for mobility, as we did in our evolution. The orbital sockets have not been manipulated in any of the biological units. The ribs are C-shaped made up of three units, two lateral and one central, articulated, the last two ribs do not have a central part, they would be the inferior floating ribs.
Near where the eggs are in the belly, there are eggs in different stages of gestational progression. This formation would be most similar to ovoviviparous in their matrotrophy mode, which are eggs that require a complementary contribution from the mother through alimentary vessels. And all these come from a placental core. This tomography, I will explain in a few seconds.
Paleogenetics, in this case, has determined that it does not correspond to any species of our known world, that is, we resemble a bacterium more than these beings can be assured that lived on Earth. We do not know with certainty the reason for their disappearance, although we can suppose the hypothesis that they could not adapt to our known world. To make it clearer, they are creatures from another world
That is the histological study showing that it is keratin, hence it seems analogous to a reptile.
This is Victoria who is an adult, and you can see in the furcula on the inner side the tip there is not much projection. Let's zoom in on Victoria's area. Next. Look, uh. It is perhaps difficult for the non-specialist to realize it, but there is ossification post surgery. That is, it’s not only that they extracted it, but also they joined it due to some pathology that she had, and it has re-ossified again.
After that, I was able to determine what kind of brain these people would have had, and I am already calling them people because the final numerical result that it gives me is that they are not individuals from the past or the present, but from the future. So it means that these two beings, Maria and these beings of 60 cm in height, should have existed in the future, not in the past 1000 years or 1 year of difference. But I cannot answer this question, so I cannot do it either. Why do they appear in the past and not in the future when our current human species is disappearing and Maria would be the last link of our human species that is evolving towards another new species?
Jaime: Doctor, are you telling us that if you project the evolution of the human being into the future, we could probably, in about three million years, be similar to those beings?
It's possible. Look, I'll give you an example of how the earth could be hostile to man at that time, that these small beings, as I call them, come to have a body that no longer serves them to survive, a body that is useless, they cannot walk, they cannot grab things by hand. Faced with the world, if the body no longer serves them, they develop the brain much more to handle everything with the brain.
However, it provides [them] with a much larger pituitary cavity than ours, which means great hormonal activity. Then it gives us the back of the skull, a great cerebellar activity, of balance. Why? Because they cannot walk; those three fingers prevent them from walking and moving, and their hands prevent them from grasping things.
Well, on August 1, 2019, not four bodies as already said by a journalist, retaining the right not to give information about his source, we started our investigations with disbelief, of course, taking radiographic samples thanks to the collaboration of a great doctor, a great teacher who has dedicated his life to radiography - I refer to doctor Mendoza Vizcarreta.
These initial images resulted in these bodies showing signs of being real. To deepen the investigations, going into our own pockets, the researchers from our university team took them to Lima to the Quito studio for tomography. Well, the reading of the tomographies confirmed that they were authentic bodies. However, we received a series of criticisms; we were told that these bodies were assembled with llama heads—you have probably heard this before—with bones of children and birds, it was practically a fake. So we moved on to the next phase of the investigation.
…for the body called Albert that we have in images. We examined the whole superficial upper part of the body and we found absolutely no signs of manipulation. There are no joints, no sutures, absolutely nothing. The body is normal; the skin is completely real. And we realized that the body was keratinized, like reptiles. We realized that the elongated head, as you have seen, does not have an ear flap, does not have hair, and the eyes are too large for the face. The nasal septum is small, a small mouth, and then the whole structure of the body is completely emaciated, ending in four limbs with three fingers in each one.
So, to rule out the possibility that these bodies had been assembled, we took samples; you can see the head; we took a sample from the head, and then we realized that when we took samples from the head to see if it was from a llama or not, there was something that moved inside the brain, inside the cranial vault. And we approached that window that you can see in figure three, and we found a strange mass that looked like brain tissue. We took a small sample of this, and then we sent it to Mexico. In the laboratories of Mexico, they have concluded that these are tissues that do not correspond to human brain tissue or other animals.
Similarly, we took a sample from the part of the thorax, from the right rib, and you can see in image number one that when we cut that part, we found an organ, apparently a liver. There you can see the color. Likewise, a sample was taken. That one is still under analysis. With this, we realized that these beings have a brain and internal organs. The immediate question arises: what grave robber would dare to create a doll, assemble a doll with internal organs? It's impossible. If that were the case, surely these organs would immediately deteriorate for a number of reasons.
Similarly, in the right femur, we also made cuts, took the samples, and these three samples from the head, the thorax, and the femur, we sent them to a friend university, a very prestigious university in Peru, the Engineering University, which has—well, good laboratories, good equipment to research and see if these elements, or rather these samples, belonged to different beings. The biochemical analysis resulted in that the samples belonged to the same individual. This has given us the strength to completely rule out that these beings have been assembled.
First, we made a hole, a bore with the tools used by dentists, and took the sample; you can see that swollen belly, we took the samples and sent them equally to the Engineering University to see if they actually were elements, animal elements. So, the analyses have also concluded that they are biological elements. So it is completely ruled out that they are pebbles. There you can see in figure two, uh, the radiography that was taken with that incrustation with, uh, that hypodermic needle, introduced into the part of the egg in this case. Well, another image. There you can see the frontal image of the eggs and also the lateral image, let's say. Well, there you can even see a kind of gastric fiber that supports the eggs. Please pass the image. There we can clearly observe a tomographic reading, and when the tomographic cut was made, embryos were found in the eggs. You can see in those figures, embryos, that is, it was in the middle of the reproductive process at the time of its death.
Moreover, the artifact that these beings have in their chest does not have a set of internal filaments; they are two, two parallel plates, not more or less than a thickness of 3 mm, the interior is hollow and inside precisely there is a series of circuits that make us think that it was a very special artifact. I asked the analyst of this mineral, and they said what this artifact could be for, and they said at the very least, it could not be for localization if not for communication.
On October 25th of the current year, the analysis by scanning electron microscopy SEM was carried out in the metallurgy and materials engineering laboratories of the National Polytechnic Institute on one of the non-human bodies. The analyzed plate is mostly made up of silver and has traces of other metals.
Traces of silver chloride were found, a chemical compound that is toxic to humans. The fact that there is a silver plate with silver chloride inside the skin of some being tells us that precisely it is not something terrestrial or human that contains it because it would cause strong intoxication.
…the level of purity of the silver is 95%, which is practically unknown in nature, and therefore it had to have been made or manufactured by intelligent beings.
…we see that comparing these dimensions in the case of the mummy María, the proportion of the volume of the face and the skull is 1 to 1.3. In the normal adult human, it is one to one. The difference is 419 cm³. What does this mean? That there is 419 cm³ more or greater encephalic mass than in the human, according to the criteria and principles of evolution. It means that this specimen should have had a higher intelligence than the human. I'm not saying it, we're seeing it there with the evidence.
The diagnosis here also indicates that María had a marked prognathism or mandibular protrusion, that is, it was very projected forward as well. This is also an uncommon finding in a normal human. Next. But what's interesting is that in María, both situations were present; she had both maxillary prognathism and mandibular protrusion at once. That's why we say she has bi-protrusion, double, I mean if one and the other were rare, much rarer is to have both.
…we also detected in this specimen María that she had a periorbital ocular area, meaning she also had the eyeballs projected forward.
We have also made a characterization of the spinal column, and we have found some lesions. Next. At the level of the thoracic spinal column, we have found lesions at the level of the vertebrae T2, T7, T12, and L1, lesions that correspond to arthropathies, which our specialist, the radiologist Dr. Daniel Mendoza, will explain. We have also found that at the level of the lumbar spinal column, there is one vertebra less. We humans have five lumbar vertebrae; here, there are four. Therefore, this is also not a normal trait in humans.
We have performed an analysis of the interalveolar region, that is, teeth and alveoli, maxilla and mandible, and we have found interesting findings. For example, what you are seeing there is the first odontogram made. This specimen María had indeed 32 teeth as any normal adult does. However, we found that she had lost six teeth and had only four root remnants, meaning she only possessed the roots of these four teeth. The right and left lower molars on the mandible side were absent. We also observed she had strong tooth wear, a marked wear technically known as dental abrasion. Next. We observe in this mandibular area the loss of three dental pieces, but the strange thing here is that the residual bone has a homogeneity and regularity that is compatible with surgical work, like the professional work that would have been done by a dentist. The question remains: Who did it, when did they do it, how did they do it, and with what instrument were these proceedings done?
We have made a calculation of the age using Broadwell's wear system method; we determined that the age according to this methodology was between 33 and 45 years old. The technical criteria are there in the slide. Next. But we also made an estimation of the age based on the method of the closure of cranial sutures, mainly the coronal suture and the closure of sutures at the lateral ends. According to this technique, María's age would be between 35 and 40 years old.
We humans have on this calcaneus bone a strong prominence towards the back that forms the heel, which enables us to stand upright and even lean back a little. In the case of this specimen María, the calcaneus was totally different. As you can see in the image, it was rounded and did not have any posterior prominence, which leads us to suppose that María could not stand upright as we do but would lean forward when standing or walking.
There are many differences. This leads us to suppose that María could be a hybrid. We already know that when a specimen has characteristics of one species and has characteristics of another species, that is technically called a hybrid. Were her bones very robust? Yes, very robust, for example, there are more differences that I have not been able to mention. For example, at the level of the forearm, there is an average separation of 21 mm between the radius and the ulna, which is not usual in humans. This is more similar to the arm of a gorilla.
…this specimen, well here we see a 3D reconstruction so you can better see the distribution of these eggs inside this specimen, of which samples were taken from two of these eggs, and we can also see there the different type of density these eggs have, which indicates that they are in a different stage of development, each one.
But what really caught my attention is that when taking the sample from this metallic plate from the central part, and when removing it, as we can see in the image on the left side of the monitor marked with a red arrow, is the space that is left when removing the plate and the central image is the inner side of the plate that has come out with soft tissue attached to the plate, that is, when removing the plate it came out with epithelial tissue stuck to the plate. This leads me to suppose that there is some kind of biointegration.
The most notable things that have been found were mainly at the maxillofacial level. First, I'm going to show here, as you can see on the screen, this sagittal cut, we can clearly observe in a normal cortex in a human being, the cortex is quite proportional, symmetrical, a singularity that we can see here in María, and another very notable thing in this sagittal cut is that the proportion, the thickness, is much, much more, much wider, it is up to two or three times thicker, much thicker than what a human being, let's say, who had a 2mm, could have such a thick skull under a normal standard, no, no.
I mean the skull of María was not culturally modified, nor flattened, nor pressed to stretch, no, due to the regularity of the skull, there are no recesses, there are no protrusions, that cortex would have to be thin, thick, thin, if it was in the places, quite irregular with recesses and protrusions.
Here, for example, another thing that is quite striking is the, uh, the shape of the orbits, the size of the orbits is quite significant in the case of María, uh, in this image where the orbits are, we can observe the size to be 54 mm, the approximate standard is 35 mm. Even in the head of a person of 2 meters, a large head, you do not require such a high standard as what we are finding here
As can be seen, out of the 647 million reads, 97.38% of them were successfully identified, and only 2.62% of the sequences could not be matched with known living organisms, that is, approximately 16 million reads. So, these 16 million sequences did not coincide with any known living organisms to date. Of this large amount of identified DNA, that is, 97.38% of the sequences, a small percentage corresponds to DNA from microorganisms that contaminated the sample or that are part of the tegumentary microbiota—specifically 2.13% of the isolated sequences from María. Thus, the remaining 95.25% corresponds to DNA from the tissue of the organism in question. As can be observed, there is a descending distribution in the identified percentages as we move away from ancestral lineages in the phylogenetic tree until we observe the lowest percentage in the organism identified down to genus and species. That is, this sequence read archive tool manages to fully or partially identify a large part of the genetic composition of the organism in question. Focusing on the final result, it is striking that 30.22% of the sequences match the human genome, Homo sapiens, but also includes an anomalous taxonomic branch of the genus Pan with 3.05% of the sequences from the organism under study, as can be seen in slide number two.
To delve deeper into this finding, the Corona analysis was deployed, which shows a pie chart of the percentage of sequence reads. In this new diagram, the representation of the Pan genus percentage can be observed, along with two hidden elements that, when hovered over with the cursor and double-clicked, reveal the hidden information. Surprisingly, the new information corresponds to sequences identified in two species of apes, which are classified by genus and species: Pan troglodytes and Pan paniscus, i.e., chimpanzees and bonobos, respectively. I am asked to shorten my speech due to time constraints, but what I want to conclude essentially is that this organism contains sequences from two apes that come from Africa, which is very strange and a relatively similar proportion, approximately 15% of them. This speaks to us, basically, that it is indeed a hybrid, and there are comparisons in the following slides.
Commenting on the new "mantid" species:
This is practically the last specimen mentioned by the doctor: an unknown specimen with a small head, a small cervical spine, and a pelvic cavity with strange objects, appendages on the dorsocervical area resembling fins, and undoubtedly, the long bones show a radiolucent image in the center corresponding to the bone marrow. As you know, bone marrow is the factory for the blood's formed elements, the producers of erythrocytes which will form red blood cells. Without a doubt, this specimen has been a biological being that has surely lived. On the other hand, these extremities have joints, and from here, I can see they have three fingers. This is the last specimen that was brought to my study. There it is. It is a specimen that has lived, a biological being. Notice in the long bones the central part which is the marrow and the well-defined cortical areas of the bones, and those strange radiopaque, ovoid-shaped objects with well-defined contours in the pelvic cavity, presumed to be eggs.
Commenting on Luisa:
What catches my attention is that in the middle floor, where the sella turcica normally exists, it cannot be seen; there is no sella turcica. However, in the maxillofacial mass, there's a beak-like prominence and an oral pharyngeal cavity beneath the base of the skull. The cerebral circulations that are imprinted on the inner table can be inferred.
Commenting on Maria:
We can presume that this specimen has had diseases, probably inflammatory diseases, and among the inflammatory diseases we see today in modern life, there is tuberculosis. The other slide. Her feet have three metatarsals and three toes, and each toe has three phalanges. There are radiolucent lesions between the metatarsophalangeal joints apparently as a consequence of chronic inflammatory processes.
© 2024 strange universe